An anti-abortion group that refers to itself as “Project Truth” visited American River College Monday to discuss its feelings on the subject.
The group goes to college campuses all around the country, handing out flyers and engaging in conversation with students passing by.
“(We) talk to students about our group and to talk about the injustice of abortion,” according to Project Truth member Ed Whitfield.
“We usually get a good response, depending on the student,” said Whitfield. “We’ll have a lot of discussions about whether they think it’s right.”
William Wilberforce, a Project Truth member, called the continuous act of abortion in the U.S. a holocaust.
“57 million babies, that’s a holocaust,” Wilberforce said. “57 million pre-born babies, human lives have been snuffed out under this idea of choice. Even the Germans called it choice, they thought it was choice to get rid of what they called parasites.”
Jorge Riley, a member of Project Truth and an ARC student, said “I think we’ll see with technology that abortion is this day-in-age’s version of slavery’s evilness. … It’s irrefutable to say that they’re just blobs of skin.”
Bud Reeves, another member of the group, interjected on Riley’s comment to add more.
“Roe v Wade made these little people in the womb property of the state that can be disposed of, like slavery,” Reeves said. “We (have this discussion) civilly and we’re winning. America is moving more and more toward gaining respect for human life.”
Added Reeves: “As Dr. King said, if we allow injustice anywhere, it can go everywhere, and this is an injustice.”
Many students walked by the set ups and some took flyers, which were located in front of the library and near the Student Center, but less actually stopped to talk with members of the group.
George Coon, an ARC student and father of three, said he didn’t understand why it was necessary for the group to come to a college campus.
Coon had only stopped to view the signs, but didn’t take a flyer or engage in any discussion with the group.
“I feel like displaying these images in the middle of campus are disrespectful to the students and the learning environment,” Coon said. “If they really want to be efficient with this, they should display it at an abortion clinic, outside of a courthouse, outside of a polling place.”
Coon said that while he agrees with the group’s right to express its right of free speech and that the subject is “tough,” he believes a college campus isn’t the right place.
“You know there’s some girls that may have done this, and it might really mess up their day,” Coon said. “I got three kids of my own, and I know people who’ve done it. And it’s very hard, to live with that choice, and then have kids later.”
According to Whitfield, the biggest outcry the group typically sees is in response to the pictures that it posts around the set up.
“These are really gruesome, awful pictures,” said Whitfield. “They can express so much.”
Added Whitfield: “They see (the pictures) and say ‘wow, I don’t want to do that.’ So pictures show a lot.”
John Edgar, another member, said the conversations with students can go many different ways.
“There are students that oppose it, students that appreciate it, and there are students that are kind of on the fence–that have never really thought it through,” Edgar said. “And, they’re really our target audience, typically. The ones that haven’t looked at all the facts, and haven’t really found out ‘when does human life begin?’ ”
Several members of the group said that while it doesn’t happen often, conversations can sometimes go awry.
“Sometimes they’ve gotten violent, where they try to knock down our display, or shout or spit at us,” Edgar said. “We actually had a professor on this campus that threatened to tear down our display, and actually encouraged his students to do it.”
Rose Galloway, an ARC student, is pro choice and engaged in debate with one of the Project Truth speakers before going to her next class.
“It’s your body, it’s your choice,” Galloway said.
Galloway said that while she personally doesn’t “know a lot of struggle,” she still believes it’s up to the person what they want to decide.
“I’d rather not have a kid if I knew I was going to be a bad mom,” Galloway said. “But this (the brochure handed out by the group) isn’t going to change my opinion.”
Jordan Schauberger and Trevor Haynes contributed to this report
chris • Mar 18, 2016 at 12:00 am
Personally i did not have a problem with these people being on campus.I have seen political groups on campus many times over the last year.Many of them more liberal,so it was nice to see a conservative group on campus.
Rob Veline • Mar 17, 2016 at 7:16 pm
Wow, is Jorge Riley still going to this school? He’s been here for a decade at least. He kept showing up drunk and threatening people one year so we had to ban him from the Student Center and have campus police monitor him. You’d think that after 10 years he’d be finishing up his classes to transfer, or something.
John • Mar 17, 2016 at 1:24 pm
Is it safe for an unborn person at ARC?
Not if her mother believes the lie that she is a parasite. Let’s try and make ARC safe for all humans.
James Conrad • Mar 17, 2016 at 10:51 am
Fair and well written article. Thank you!
Janie • Mar 15, 2016 at 6:20 pm
I feel like this was inappropriate to have on campus. ARC should be a safe place to learn free of emotional harmful images like the ones displayed today. I know people who have went through this and it’s a sensitive subject. I look at ARC as a safe environment, but I’m sure many people felt all sorts of upset and violation because of these people.